1. Dialectic
of Enlightenment
a.What is "Enlightenment"?
The
enlightenment is a way of seen a new process of which dispel myths and fantasy
and replace it with true knowledge and facts. The humanity should learn from
the nature and reduce the fear of mythical. The metaphysics meeting the human
being and they were still left in the myth of life and death.
b.What is "dialectic"?
Dialectic is objective
definition in which the thinking what a object is thought what it’s not is. In
this way the concept and thing become separate.
c.What is "nominalism" and why is it an
important concept in the text?
The nominalism
are a description of a general concepts of something excising, an independent
thing that has nothing meaningful except the name of it. The only property of
the thing is the “word”.
d.What is the meaning and function of "myth"
in Adorno and Horkheimer's argument?
The meaning
of myth in the context is to explain that these kinds of thoughts are something
that isn’t realistic in the real world, to reduce the fear. It’s contexts of
something that have been speculating since back from the history. The function
is to explain the non-realistic thoughts of the human being, the super natural
phenomena, spirits and the demons.
2. "The
Work of Art in the Age of Technical Reproductivity"
a. In the
beginning of the essay, Benjamin talks about the relation between
"superstructure" and "substructure" in the capitalist order
of production. What do the concepts "superstructure" and "substructure"
mean in this context and what is the point of analyzing cultural production
from a Marxist perspective?
The
substructure is in the way of something in production, in this context as
painting, art creating, movies, theatres etc. But the superstructure is
everything except the production, like the environment of our society, politics
and laws.
b. Does culture
have revolutionary potentials (according to Benjamin)? If so, describe these
potentials. Does Benjamin's perspective differ from the perspective of Adorno
& Horkheimer in this regard?
Benjamin saw
the potentials of the culture in a way of the development of photography. He
argues for the presence of time and space as a unique existence at the place. He
rise the theory of a negative, a revolutionary mean of reproduction, photography.
Later it would be an evidence of the history and the mechanical reproduction.
c. Benjamin
discusses how people perceive the world through the senses and argues that this
perception can be both naturally and historically determined. What does this
mean? Give some examples of historically determined perception (from Benjamin's
essay and/or other contexts).
It means that
we as humans can build us knowledge through both natural references and the
historical has already happened, the experience of people's past lives.
Benjamin gave an example of the Roman art, in the school of Viennese where they
draw conclusions that where limited to the significant. They didn’t attempt to
show the changes of perception, because they didn’t know how.
d. What does
Benjamin mean by the term "aura"? Are there different kinds of aura
in natural objects compared to art objects?
He defined the Aura as the “unique phenomena of
distance, however it be. “ He explains the natural aura as the reproduction of
something real in the way of looking closer to the object. The art may not meet
the experiences of something real, regardless it has a very good quality and by
analogy. Its only your eyes that can reproduce something real.
Hi Kristina,
SvaraRaderaI like your post and I find the last part about aura is interesting because Im not sure if I have the same interpretation of Benjamin's word "aura" as you. I think of the word aura as an objects unique attachment, like a human’s personality or a special feeling of the sunlight or something like that. I understand the word aura as the special soul of a moment or a person that often disappears when you reproduce an object.